From: John Croft
Message: 1951
Date: 2000-03-27
> The researchers found that 98.8pc of men with Gaelic Connacht surnamesfrom
> (Ruane), carried the group of genes. But the further east people came
> (indicated by surname), the lower the frequency of the genetic trait.It was
> carried by just 62.5% of the English (Hill)surnames, 52.9% of theScottish
> surnames (Blair) and 83% of the Norman and Norse surnames(Fitzgerald).
>98.8%)
> I note with interest the two closest groups are the (Connacht/Irish:
> with the (Norman/Norse: 83%). This apparent relationshipapparently
> is to me, most significant historically, but was not the focus,
> of the study and reports. I suggest that one factor in thedifference in
> these two groups is related to natural homogeny of island overmainland
> circumstances.affiliated, while
>
> Also, regional variation from other insular groups carried similar
> indicators: surnames apparently originating in Munster dropped only
> to 94.6%. Ulster: 81.1. Leinster in the south east: 73.3
>
> Reports and reporters however, suggest that the east-west pattern
> continues across Europe. Basques are said to be 89 % (!!)
> Turks: just 1.8.the
>
> Comments, anyone? More data?
>
> (Minor harassing note for John: Observe that the Norse/Norman surname
> variance was identical and they were therefore grouped together, as Y
> indicators were not influenced by their PROTO-French Celtic wives on
> Continent :-)Rex, regarding the so called Norse Norman name Fitzgerald, in fact came