Re: Germanic weak verbs and **do**

From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 1808
Date: 2000-03-09

 
----- Original Message -----
From: Piotr Gasiorowski
To: cybalist@egroups.com
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2000 3:46 PM
Subject: [cybalist] Odp: Germanic weak verbs and **do**

 
----- Original Message -----
From: Mark Odegard
To: cybalist@egroups.com
Sent: Sunday, March 05, 2000 7:03 PM
Subject: [cybalist] Germanic weak verbs and **do**

A small self-correction:
I wrote: ... It was only the preterite and the past participle of such verbs that contained the suffix *-d- often interpreted as an incorporated form of *dh(e)H-. The present-tense stem DID NOT contain it. E.g. Old English lufian 'to love', p. lufode derive from *lubo:-j-o: and *lubo:-d- respectively.
I gave the form of the OE infinitive and the protoform of the 1st person sg. Actually lufian < *lubo:-j-ana-. The point is that one stem form (*lubo:j-) is used for the infinitive and the present tense and another (*lubo:d-) for the preterite and the past participle. It is the preterite stem that is a Germanic innovation.
 
... and an afterthought:
 
BTW, compounding dheH with a noun to form a verb was already PIE practice:
 
*kred-dheH- 'entrust, commit, place as a loan' (Latin  cre:do, OIrish cretim, Skt. śrad-dha:-)
Skt. na:man-dha:- 'give a name, call'
 
Piotr