From: John Croft
Message: 1534
Date: 2000-02-17
> >John, In attempting a gLeNic construction for the Nostratic languageare you
> >family, you set up a very interesting schema. But I have (2)
>questions:
> >why are you seperating Sumerian from Elamite + Dravidian >and why
> >giving PIE equal status with the extinct Etruscan >language foundonly in
> >an area around Rome?closely
>
> Not sure about John, but in my view, PIE and Etruscan are very
> related. Etruscan appears to be different enough from PIE to beseperate but
> still sharing close ties with the most archaic IE branch, Anatolian.Due to
> the striking similarities, many scholars have once been confused (andlanguage.
> perhaps still are) in thinking that Etruscan was in fact an IE
> This is true only if you extend the IE language back a thousand yearsor
> more (4500+ BCE).very
>
> My view is that EtruscoLemnian (a branch from which Etruscan and a
> close sister language, Lemnian, sprang from) was one of a series ofthe
> linguistic and physical migrations from the Pontic-Caspian towards
> Balkans, starting from 4500 BCE (Kurgan I). Lemnian is known to haveclose
> ties to Etruscan and so, Gerry, you are incorrect in thinking thatthis was
> only a Rome affair.followed by
>
> The next waves to spring forth after the EtruscoLemnian wave were the
> Anatolian waves. I say "waves" (with an -s) because I theorize that
> Lyco-Lydian might have been the first of these waves eventually
> the last wave Hittite-Luwian. In such a case, the term "Anatolian" isold"
> somewhat of a loosely defined word, only meaning "the oldest of the
> under IE studies.Glen you astound me. Not only do you have Etrusco-Lemnian translated