From: John Croft
Message: 1528
Date: 2000-02-17
>So Glen, are you saying that language movement was from the Middlefrom the
>East
> >into Egypt while the people movement was from Nubia? That >might be
> >partially correct; however, are you certain that no people >moved
> >Middle East into Egypt? This seems a bit peculiar.That
> This spread of language into Africa doesn't have to be immediate butrather
> a trend happening over thousands of years. Nothing peculiar at all.Just
> language displacement at work.But for language displacement to be at work, you need to have two
> I'll admit that I'm not caught up on my Egyptian but it isAfroAsiatic and
> AfroAsiatic is a Nostratic language. In the most commonly heldNostratic
> hypothesis, AA must be from the Middle East since this is surely theof
> homeland of Nostratic itself which is based on the pattern of spread
> these languages. The geography of Eurasia lends few options for thisThe Middle East remains the homeland of Nostratic only if you continue
> homeland other than the Middle East area.
> I don't know the archaeology involving the Egyptians but even ifthere is
> absolutely no proof available of physical movement from the MiddleEast to
> Egypt, we can hardly use this lack of evidence as proof that theEgyptian
> language and consequently the AfroAsiatic tongue is native to Africa.Egypt
> and the Middle East are not obstructed from each other and I can'tsee why
> it's not possible for language to have spread into Africa despite anyTrue, from what I understand, the Egyptian language has a non-Semitic
> population movement.
> Of course, AA's movement into Africa would have happened after thelast ice
> age and one wonders how much population existed at the time anyway -anyone
> have answers?Yes, population demographics indicates that at about 10,000 BCE we are
> So this is a definite possibility for the _language_ (not the peopleper se)
> that we, as linguists (not geneticists), have to consider. The onlyway to
> determine the direction of language itself is to look to the directsource
> of the answer, linguistics. You can examine genetics till you're bluein the
> face but it won't help very much to solve this puzzle. It'sself-defeating.