From: Glen Gordon
Message: 1520
Date: 2000-02-16
>These two forms are unrelated as far as my understanding of ACYes, in AC morphology but they can still be related in SinoTibetan
>morphlogy goes.
> > Dene-Caucasian SinoTib AC BasqueHmm, well I wouldn't protest to an ST form *nlya? either.
> > *m-lir "ear" *nli? b/ni? belarri
>The TB word has a -a, never a -i, unless you know a language that
>has??..
>> *m-hutL "eye" *mriwk b/mriwk begiHmm, strange. Where would /mgul/ come from, I wonder. Can't place it within
>> *m-NuN "heart" *sny@... b/sym bihotz
>> *m-kug "leg" *kuk b/kak --
>>
>>Hmm, lookin' good so far in terms of the consonants but I haven't
>>figured out the vowel pattern in AC yet, obviously. The form for >>
>>"heart" seems to have an s- prefix instead of the expected *m-.
>
>There is in fact a m- prefixed word for "heart in TB. mgul in tib.
>MC chinese has kjak.Oh. Cool.
>Now, I just has a look at Yue Hashimoto 1972, "phonology of >cantonese",
>which gives the correspondance between MC and cantonese, has -oe:k in
>her notation for -jak. This is all very regular.
> > Dene-Caucasian SinoTib AC BasqueThought you'd like that one. I think it's better than pleading for an
> > *sul-mu "three" *sl@... slym hiru
> > *li-mu "four" *li b/s-li lau
> > *piNu "five" *pN@ a/nga? bost
> > *rutL "six" *truk b/rok (sei)
> > *sulrit "seven" *snit b/snit sortzi "8"
> > *mnrit "eight" *prit b/pret bederatzi "9"
> > *hmsi "ten" *psi b/gip hamar
>
>No. WT bcu reflects something like *p-cip, I think, although it is
>difficult to prove. The word for "water" in WT has chu, but a >literary
>word for water is chab. I can't explain those variations, >but it is not
>surprising that loanwords have a funny phonological >behavior.
>>form in -u might be explained as influence with "nine"?
>That is also a interesting explanation.
>>Huh? Where does the /-r?/ come from? I think you mean that b/lhuj?No problem. I'm not reconstructing AC with /sl-/, I mean _SinoTibetan_ *sl,
>>from *sluj? so that we can explain the otherwise problematic lh- >> sound,
>>just as AC /lha/ is from *sla? "rodent", yes?
>
>I told you already, sy- in MC comes regularly from b/lh-.
>Final -j reflects often -r or -l, as final -n does also. This is >reflectedThe AN root is not convincing because the Basque form /elur/ has nothing to
>in early Zhou riming where words in -j and -n rime with >each other, and of
>course in word families and phonetic series.
>Note that AN has a very clear root luR "flowing", possibly related to
>chinese.
>>The AC form b/wa? is beautiful for my evil purposes. The /?/ canSpeculation without any substantiation is never a good rebuttle. Your point
>>easily be
>
>My personal opinion is that there was a -h in AC, but its behaviour
>was the same as -s (because -s needs to become -h before it can change into
>a tonal feature). I am sure it is true (it is the case >in AA languages),
>but it is rather difficult to prove with riming, >phonetic series or even
>loanwords. So I don't think ? > h is a good >idea.
>There seems your proto-language was as difficult to pronounce as >georgian,Yes, more like Abkhaz though. :) I've been extrapolating and analysing some
>with all those consonant clusters.
>By the way... Starostin proposed a comparison of chinese bjun < b/bynI don't see how this is necessarily unrelated within SinoTibetan. Terms such
>"big horned goat with various TB words. However Sagart showed that >the
>primary meaning was 'big horned', not 'goat'. Sorry for that one.