NeLg writes:
Excellent answer you gave to Jhon, Poitr, about the condition of IE
studies. The last point is especially something that should be
understood about the vague term "Indo-European". I'd prefer to call the
older version "Indo-Anatolian" as opposed to "Indo-European". The term
Indo-Hittite ignores the rest of the branch that Hittite belongs to.
PS: Lesbianism is still in no way salacious.
Gerry: NeLg, Poitr, and Jhon seem to be saying that none of the terms
appear to be correct. Indo-European is vague, Indo-Hittite is allusive,
and as far as I'm concerned Indo-Anatolian could hold true for Turkic
Indo sector of I-E but not for the remainder. What wrong with say
Indo-Aryan or is the term Aryan "loaded"?
Yreg
--
Gerald Reinhart
Independent Scholar
(650) 321-7378
waluk@...
http://www.alekseevmanuscript.com