From: JoatSimeon@...
Message: 589
Date: 1999-12-16
>afme@... writes:-- nope. Your data is very out of date.
>C14 Dating. It is VERY error prone, mainly because it assumes uniformity
>and science has just thrown out the ultimate constant, the speed of light.-- what on earth is this supposed to mean?
>They went into counting tree rings and ice cores to rectify this and onlyfound more anomalies.
>The Russians reported several villages, dated between 13 - 18,000 BC, withfactories and an organised layout.
>I stand told, can have only come about from nuclear stuff, redolent of theMahabharata, quoted by Oppenheimer at the Wite Sands test :"Brighter than A
>the sine qua non of acceptability to call it logical.-- English isn't your native language, eh?