From: Alexander Stolbov
Message: 370
Date: 1999-11-30
> Alexander:Alexander:
> Yes, the combination of the sights of a subject from above and from side
> in one
> picture is well understandable. I can add some examples from the
> Neolithic -
> Bronze Age period: Catal Huyuk (plan of the "town" + picture of the
> volcano),
> Egypt (procession of winners from side + headless defeated from above).
> However I know only 2 cases of picturing vehicles in such a manner.
>
>
> Gerry here: But is the picture of the volcano superimposed on the plan
> of the "town"?
> And the reference to Egypt, is what you are referring toYes, I meant the Narmer Palette. Well, connection of this 2 parts is not as
> the Narmer Palette? If indeed it is, then the procession is clearly
> seperate from the massacre.
> What are the references to the 2 vehicles?Sorry, I have expressed myself not quite clear. I meant 2 styles of picturing
>Piotr informed us (Nov, 20) about the age of the pot:
> Back to Bronocice, is the idea of a wagon unique for this time period?
> At least a wagon indicates group activity -- i.e. a group of animalsI don't think that the people who made the Bronocice pot could be directly
> pulling it, a group of foodstuff or people in the wagon. And when you
> think of farming it can only be done with a group (usually a family).
> How different from the nomadic Scythians.