Jonathon Blake wrote:

> Barry wrote:
>
>
> > - Others, who are *not* familiar with ORA, as evidenced by their
>
> Yourself being the best example.
>
> > - Others, who are familiar with the wider variety and spirit of the
> publisher thought tit would be a good idea.
>
> It was the people who know what ORA does, that stated it was not a fit.

Jonathon,

Would that be yourself you are referring to?

If you know something more specific then your interpretation of their
web site versus mine, I am willing to hear of it and to stand corrected.

My reading, combined with having spoke with more then one author or
editor in the past, is that they are open to new ideas. That doesn't
mean they act on every single one, but they are open to hearing them,
and actively solicit them, even if they are seemingly offbeat at first
glance.

Short of you telling me you work for or represent ORA in this area, I
think we will have to agree to disagree, OK? It does not seem like a
critical matter to me.

Best,

Barry