On Mon, 31 May 2004 06:15:51 -0700, John Hudson <tiro@...> wrote:

> Nicholas Bodley wrote:
>
>> [As to politics, (and perhaps best-forgotten history?), iirc Tibetan was
>> deleted (and later re-included), but I might well misunderstand the
>> reasons; maybe it was *not* pressure from the P.R.C.?]
>
> It was not. There were structural problems in the earlier Tibetan
> encoding, so it was replaced.

When it happened, I was quite concerned. Thank you for clearing it up!

Best,

--
Nicholas Bodley /*|*\ Waltham, Mass.
Opera 7.5 (3778), using M2