Re: Etymology of kaṇha / kāḷa ?

From: Mahinda Palihawadana
Message: 3926
Date: 2014-11-13

Dear Florian,
Another explanation, and the one we were taught during our time as students of Pali, is that these two terms are derived from Old Indo-Aryan words reflected in Sanskrit kRSNa and kaala. The former may even have an Indo-European origin, as Manfred Mayrhofer indicates in his Concise Etymological Skt Dictionary, where he refers to corresponding words in Lithuanian etc. (like, e.g., Kirsna, name of a river, much like kRSNaa which occurs  in Sanskrit as the name of a river.)
Best regards.
Mahinda

On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 7:26 AM, 'Jim Anderson' jimanderson.on@... [palistudy] <palistudy@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
Hi Florian,

As far as I know, the two terms are not etymologically related since each
are based on entirely different verbal roots. The root of kaṇha is either KU
or KAS and I'm assuming KAL is the root of kāḷa (or kāla). The Dhātumālā
section of the Saddanīti takes KU to be the root of kaṇha while the ṭīkā on
the Abhidhānappadīpikā takes KAS as the root.

The vikaraṇa affix ṇha may come after the roots of a very small class
beginning with GAH which can yield such forms as gaṇhāti, taṇhā, uṇha,
juṇha, saṇha. etc. The final consonant, if any, is elided before the ṇha
affix can be added. Interestingly, the Dhātumālā does not include KAS in the
gahādi class. KU has the meaning of contempt, reproach (kucchā) while KAS
has the meaning of scratching (vilekhana). I can't understand how or why KU
changes to ka before ṇha. The Dhātumālā gives three KAL roots and one for
KAḶ which all would have to be investigated to determine which one the
meaning of black belongs.

Best wishes,

Jim

----- Original Message -----
From: "Florian Weps fmw@... [palistudy]" <palistudy@yahoogroups.com>
To: <palistudy@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: November 11, 2014 11:15 AM
Subject: [palistudy] Etymology of kaṇha / kāḷa ?


Dear all

recently, I came across the synonyms kaṇha and kāḷa.  I got the idea that
these
two might be variant spellings or dialectal differences - retroflex ṇh and
ḷ,
the latter between vowels here, seem to be very similar sounds.

Is there any basis to this understanding of mine?

Kind regards,
Florian



------------------------------------
Posted by: "Jim Anderson" <jimanderson.on@...>
------------------------------------


------------------------------------

Yahoo Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/palistudy/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/palistudy/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    palistudy-digest@yahoogroups.com
    palistudy-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    palistudy-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to:
    https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/



Previous in thread: 3925
Next in thread: 3927
Previous message: 3925
Next message: 3927

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all posts