Dear Dr. Pind, all,

In a recent post responding to Rene, I made the comment that a
bahubbiihi is not "formally an adjective" but agrees with an external
noun as a formal adjective would, yet is still a substantive. I would
like to point out that I am apparently wrong based on the below comment
of Dr. Pind. I was under the impression that a "formal adjective"
describes a noun in conjunction with the verb "to be." I am obviously
wrong on this point too. I will have to do some reading about this
issue, so if anyone can recommend any good source that describes the
grammatical usage and role of an adjective according to western
philologists, then I would appreciate it.

Metta,

Alan


Ole Holten Pind wrote:

>Dear Rene,
>
>Any possessive compound qualifying a noun in any given case form is formally
>an adjective, and it therefore inflects like any given adjective,
>irrespective of whether the compound terminates in a noun.
>
>Ole Pind
>
>-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
>Fra: Pali@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Pali@yahoogroups.com] På vegne af rsalm
>Sendt: 22. oktober 2005 16:12
>Til: Pali@yahoogroups.com
>Emne: [Pali] Bahubbiihi cpds
>
>Dear group,
>
> I have read through Whitney’s chapter 18 of “A Sanskrit Grammar,” and
>it's becoming increasingly evident to me how untenable is the original
>thesis that “all bahubbiihi compounds must end in nouns.” Dr. Pind, Alan,
>and Rett have all recently taken a more moderate stance, either making way
>for exceptions (Ole), or accepting that the last member of a Bh is a noun or
>an adj. used as a noun” (Alan, Rett). However, now with the benefit of
>Whitney’s treatment, I am able to add a second line of argument. Up until
>now I have been reasoning from empirical data: the examples I came across in
>grammars simply did not all end with nouns. Whitney, however, shows that the
>last element in a Bh *can’t* function as a noun! If it is originally a noun,
>it must undergo changes in Sanskrit in order precisely to function as an
>adj. This is because the bahubbiihi cpd (“possessive” cpd for Whitney) MUST
>BE ADJECTIVAL-- after all, it qualifies the exoteric word. The rule to keep
>in mind is this: a compound takes its part of speech from the last element
>(Whitney paragraph 1247f, Warder 137). Therefore, because the compound in a
>Bh must function adjectivlly, then the last element must also be either an
>adjective or a noun functioning as an adj (not the reverse!). Whitney (W)
>spends many pages in his “A Sankrit Grammar” showing the changes that the
>noun must undergo (accent and ending), precisely so that they may be used
>adjectivally in a Bh. In fact, this is his main concern.
>
> I appreciate everyone’s willingness to change positions (as I’m also
>willing to change mine if the evidence presents). Believe me, I’m in no way
>putting myself up as anything but a beginniner in all this. I’ve got a lot
>to learn, and am now enjoying the process of doing so with you.
>
> Returning for a moment to the empirical argument, I accept Rett’s
>corrections to the list of adj-ending Bh’s, which I incorporate below. Two
>of the examples did not even have an exoteric element, so how they got on
>the list I don’t know. Also, I’ve removed any examples that are not
>certified by Warder or Perniola as Bh’s, and I provide page references. I’ve
>also removed certain examples (asama, mattaa) over which there are two
>possible interpretations. Finally, I’ve substituted new examples from the
>grammars to replace the ones removed. Here is a revised list of Bh’s ending
>with a non-noun:
>
>duddasa dhamma: a doctrine hard to see (Warder/188)
>
>sukata kamma: an action well done (Warder/188)
>
>susannaddha bhaara: a load well tied up (Warder/188)
>
>dhammaanudhammapa.tipanna bhikkhu: ‘a monk following the entire doctrine
>(Warder/213)
>
>manopubbangamaa dhammaa manosetthaa: ‘factors that have the mind as the
>first and as the best’ (Pern/170)
>
>anaasannavaraa etaa: ‘these are best when not near’ (Pern/170)
>
>yaanena itthiuuttena purisantarena: ‘on a cart drawn by two calves with a
>bull in between’ (Pern/172)
>
>aanando atta-dutiyo: Ananda with his self as second (Pern/170)
>
>dosantaro [manusso]: [a man] with hatred within (Pern/172)
>
>
>
>I don’t think anyone will venture to claim that all these past participles
>and adjectives are nouns or functioning “as” nouns!
>
>>From reading Whitney (W), it is clear that in Sanskrit an adjective can
>readily assume the posterior (final) position in bahuvriihi compounds, which
>W calls “possessive cpds.” This is evident from the description and examples
>he gives (see below).
>
>There are, however, a few idiosyncracies of W’s presentation. One is that
>he spends almost all of the chapter writing about noun-ending compounds. He
>devotes very little space to non-noun-enders. He does this for a good
>reason: W is most concerned with the various changes in accent and in ending
>that occur in Sanskrit when the noun compound is made adjectival, as is
>necessary to turn what he calls a determinative cpd (Kh, Tp) into a
>possessive (Bh). As I mentioned, a compound takes its part of speech from
>the posterior element. Adj-ending cpd’s already end in adj’s, so no accent
>change is required. Therefore, the great Sankritist devotes almost no time
>to this latter category.
>
> Nevertheless, W does give us the information necessary to form a clear and
>unambiguous conclusion about non-noun finals. I hunted here and there among
>the thirty pages for this information, which is parceled out among all the
>noun-final information. It is not of much interest to W, because he is
>concerned primarily with the changes necessary in noun-finals. However, the
>treatment of adj-finals is, of course, of primary interest to us in this
>discussion.
>
>Many on this list do not have a copy of Whitney nor access to one, so I’ll
>give a brief overview of how he sees cpds. His conception is not so
>dissimilar to what we know from Paali, but he uses a different terminology.
>W does not use the categories Kh and Tp (kammadhaaraya and tappurisa). He
>divides compounds into three types: (1) “copulative” (i.e. dvanda, which he
>considers connected by the conjunction ‘and’ or ‘or’); (2) “determinative
>compounds.” This class includes what Paali students know of as Kh and Tp.
>They are cpds “of which the former member is syntactically dependent on the
>latter, as its determining or qualifying adjunct” (1247d); and (3)
>“secondary adjective compounds,” whose largest category is “possessive
>compounds.” It is these possessive compounds that go by the term bahuvriihi
>(1293c).
>
>In his treatment of determinative cpds, W includes cpds that have both noun
>endings and non-noun endings. In paragaph 1247e he gives eight examples,
>five with noun and three with non-noun endings. I copy them here in the Skt,
>with W’s translations, and with my Paali category equivalents:
>
>
>
>NOUN-ending: (a) amitrasenaa, ‘army of enemies’ (gen. Tp); (b) paadodaka,
>‘water for the feet’ (dat Tp); (c) mahar.si, ‘great sage’ (Kh); (d)
>priyasakhi, ‘dear friend’ (Kh); (e) amitra, ‘enemy’ (Kh).
>
>NON-NOUN ending: (a) aayurdaa, ‘life-giving’ (acc Tp); (b) hastak.rta, ‘made
>with the hands’ (ins Tp); (c) suk.rta, ‘well done’ (Kh).
>
>
>
>Following his treatment of determinative cpds, W introduces the possessive
>cpds (Bh) with this important sentence (1293): “The possessives are
>noun-compounds of the preceding class, determinatives, of all its various
>subdivisions to which is given an adjective inflection and which take on an
>adjective meaning of a kind which is most conventiently and accurately
>defined by adding *having* or *possessing* to the meaning of the
>determinative.”
>
>The first part of the above sentence is the most important for our purposes.
>
>I now add emphasis, quotes, and explanation for clarity: “The possessives
>[i.e. Bh] are noun-compounds of the preceding class [that is, Kh and Tp],
>‘determinatives,’ *of all its various subdivisions*...” “All its various
>subdivisions,” means, of course, both noun and non-noun ending cpds, such as
>
>we find with Kh and Tp. We must always bear this rule carefully in mind.
>
>CONCLUSION: According to Whitney, bahubbiihis contain *all* the various
>kinds of Kh and Tp cpds-- his ‘determinative’ class, including both
>underlying noun-ending cpds *and* adj-ending cpds.
>
>This is the second argument that shows that in Sanskrit Bh compounds
>(“possessives”) can end in adjectives. The first argument (above) is that
>they MUST end in adjectives, or else in nouns now *functioning* as
>adjectives. This question must be considered settled, it seems to me.
>
>--------
>
>The remainder of this post has reference to certain sentences in W’s
>presentation which can admittedly mislead if one doesn’t keep the above
>‘Conclusion’ in mind, that is: Bh’s include both underlying noun-ending cpds
>
>*and* adj-ending cpds.
>
>For example, the important first sentence regarding W’s third class of cpds
>(which includes bahubbiihis) reads equivocally, even to an English-speaker,
>because of how it is worded. W writes (1247g):
>
>“Secondary adjective compounds, the value of which is not given by a simple
>resolution into their component parts, but which, though having as final
>member a noun, are themselves adjectives.” [This is not a complete sentence
>in the text.]
>
>Here, it indeed may appear that W is saying that “secondary adj. cpds” have
>“as final member a noun.” The crux lies in the words “though having.”
>‘Though’ is a subordinating conjunction in English, and it has three
>different meanings (I refer now to the New World Dict., College Ed., 1700
>pages): (1) “in spite of the fact that.” I.e.: “Secondary adj. cpds... in
>spite of the fact that they have as final member a noun, are themselves
>adjectives.” This is the erroneous reading and would mean that all 2ary adj
>cpds end with a noun. We know this is false, however, *because it is not
>consistent with the Conclusion above.*
>
> (2) The second meaning of “though” as ‘however’ also doesn’t work:
>“Secondary adj. cpds... which, however, have as final member a noun, are
>themselves adjectives.” This is also an erroneous reading, *because it is
>not consistent with the Conclusion above.*
>
> (3) The third meaning of “though” as ‘even if,’ ‘supposing that,’ does
>work: “Secondary adjective compounds, the value of which is not given by a
>simple resolution into their component parts, but which, even if having as
>final member a noun, are themselves adjectives.” This is the correct
>reading, *because it is consistent with the Conclusion above.*
>
>So this statement is not a proviso against adj-ending Bh’s, as it may at
>first seem.
>
>There are other places in the chapter which are also ambigious. The first
>sentence introducing 2ary adj. cpds in par. 1292, if read with an incorrect
>reference, also seems to demand that such a cpd must end in a noun (emphasis
>
>added):
>
>“Secondary adjective compounds. A compound *having a noun as its final
>member* very often wins secondarily the value of an adjective, being
>inflected in the three genders to agree with the noun which it qualifies,
>and used in all the constructions of an adjective.”
>
>This statement does not speak for all 2ary adj. cpds, as might appear at
>first. It only refers to those compounds that have “a noun as its final
>member.” This is only a portion of all possible cpds. It can be confusing
>largely because it comes immediately after the heading “Secondary adjective
>compounds.”
>
>Other examples in the same vein could be cited.
>
>-- Rene
>
>
>
>
>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>Paa.li-Parisaa - The Pali Collective
>[Homepage] http://www.tipitaka.net
>[Files] http://www.geocities.com/paligroup/
>[Send Message] pali@yahoogroups.com
>Yahoo! Groups members can set their delivery options to daily digest or web
>only.
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>Paa.li-Parisaa - The Pali Collective
>[Homepage] http://www.tipitaka.net
>[Files] http://www.geocities.com/paligroup/
>[Send Message] pali@yahoogroups.com
>Yahoo! Groups members can set their delivery options to daily digest or web only.
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>