On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 21:03:29 +0100, Richard Wordingham
<richard@...> wrote:

>Thanks for the wider context. A mischievous thought though - aren't there
>any laryngeals in the IE root?

Probably. My printed Pokorny is falling apart and missing the last two
pages (I have them somewhere), and I can't check the Leiden online version
(again). The other cognates were Greek, if I remember correctly. If the
*g^ is really a *g^ and not a *g^h, then Slavic does not require
laryngeals, by Winter's Law, but quite possibly the Greek forms (re:gnumi?)

Miguel Carrasquer Vidal