>All right I have an example up of how I
>would like to see the format. Bascially
>it's the same as the dictionary except
>for two points. 1. One column instead
>of two 2. one line between entries.

Indeed; but you don't seem to follow the
line-division of the original. What rule
to use instead?
*************************

I am not sure what you are referring to.

**************************

>The top portion is the OCR text which
>doesn't look good at all and has many many mistakes.
>The middle portion is the gif file
>The bottom portion is the text as I typed it

Hmm...

Your typing is *much* better than the
OCR-text but it must be corrected somewhat.

Take the first word for example:


OCR-text:

a, a negative suffix to verbs, not; era
'imakligt, at it is not unmeet that.

Svanni-text:

a, a negative suffix to vergs, not; ear
úmakligt, at it is not unmeet that.


The OCR has one mistake, it has interpreted
"úmakligt" as "'imakligt". Svanni has two
mistakes, she has written "vergs" instead
of "verbs" and "ear" instead of "era".
***********************************

True, but I didn't proofread my typing which I usually do before putting it
up. I just wanted to get an example up quick. I plan on proof reading mine.
My intention was to minimize the corrections you guys would have to do, since
you will be doing the proof reading. Maybe my buddy will be able to OCR it
for us and we won't have to worry so much about typing it. Keeping my
fingers crossed!

-Svanni

***********************************
I'm getting excited about this,
it's always good to have a brainless
activity that is useful, typing in a
dictionary is a perfect example:)

Best regards,
Haukur