Re: bidet

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "dgkilday57" wrote:

>
> > A little correction: Although he studied the isoglosses shared by
> > Aragonese and Bearnese, Elcock *never* posited a Pyrenaic substrate
> > language (as he was reluctant to substrates in general), but he said
> > that proposal was originally made by Saroïhandy, the pioneer of
> > modern Aragonese studies.
>
> Was S.'s Pyrenaic substrate Vasconic or Romance?
>

I haven't read him, but perhaps the title of his article "Vestiges de
phonétique iberienne en territoire roman" (1913) might tell us
something.