Re: Exile of Roma founders from India c. 1405 years ago

If the Roma coming from India 1400 years ago is the basis for the claim
that everyone else did, there's quite a few problems.

But let's just use the incorrect logic to deal with it.

Alexander the Great led his armies to India 900 years before the Roma
left India, so that means that Indian languages are descended from
Greek, right?

Or are we going to torture logic and history even more and claim that
Alexander's armies were so awesomely impressed that they surrendered
their native language at the Indus, and started speaking Hindi on the
way back to Babylon?

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Rick McCallister <gabaroo6958@...>
wrote:

>
> It doesn't. It's a pseudo-intelelctual point: if the Roma came from

India, then so did everyone else.

>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: r_brunner rbrunner@...
> To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 1:34 PM
> Subject: [tied] Re: Exile of Roma founders from India c. 1405 years

ago - Genetic study in PLoS of Dr. Gyaneshwer Chaubey and team.
Re-evaluate I-E/ANE studies.

>
> Â
>
>
> --- In mailto:cybalist%40yahoogroups.com, kalyan kalyan97@ wrote:
> >
> >

http://bharatkalyan97.blogspot.in/2012/11/exile-of-roma-founders-from-in\
dia-c_28.html

> >
> > Exile of Roma founders from India c. 1405 years ago - Genetic study
> > in PLoS of Dr. Gyaneshwer Chaubey and team. Re-evaluate I-E/ANE
> > ÃÂ studies.ÃÂ
> > Proponents of Aryan Invasion/Migration/Trickle-in/Tourist theorists
> > should re-think and re-evaluate the formation of Indo-European
> > languages after contacts between Hindu civilization people and
> > .people of Ancient Near East.
>
> Could you please lay out this idea more clearly? What should I

rethink, exactly? I don't have any idea how the Roma migration out of
India 1400 years ago should say or even prove something about the
origins of a language that is several thousand years older.

>