Re: Basque onddo

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Bhrihskwobhloukstroy <bhrihstlobhrouzghdhroy@...> wrote:

>
> I can't understand why You insist in a reconstruction like proche <
> proxius which, on one side, is at variance with all the rest of Your
> argumentation

Because, if I remember correctly, proxius is attested in written sources as an analogical change

AND

> since sache < sapeam, hache <
> Germanic *hapja and so on prove that /pj/ > /ʃ/ is, to say the least,
> a more regular evolution.

It. shows no ev. of py in:

* approxia:re > approcciare It; aprochier OFr;