Re: Ir. cas(s) and IE models (was: Ligurian)

Very good; then nothing to do with *xazda-

2012/5/13, Tavi <oalexandre@...>:

> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Bhrihskwobhloukstroy
> <bhrihstlobhrouzghdhroy@...> wrote:
>>
>> Germanic *xizd-o:n and Greek kíste: can be related only if you
> postulate that Gk.
>> kíste: (beside having its -t- from a different suffix) has /kist-/
> from */kst-/
>>
>> > Forgive my ignorance, but I'd like a more detailed explanation.
>>
>> I'm more ignorant, I just mean that if Germanic *xizd-o:n is related
>> to *xazda- you appear to interpret its */i/ from */e/
>> (*kes-dh(H-)o:n), so Greek kiste: must have its /i/ from Schwa
>> secundum (like pitne:mi), i.e. ks-tah2
>>
> It looks like Germanic *xizd-o:n is actually related to *xaizd-o:n 'tow'
> and Latin caesarie:s '(head) hair', Sanskrit késara- 'hair, mane'.
>
>