Re: Ligurian

From: Bhrihskwobhloukstroy
Message: 69424
Date: 2012-04-24

pseudologies

2012/4/24, Bhrihskwobhloukstroy <bhrihstlobhrouzghdhroy@...>:
> OK DGK please invent Your pseudlogies and I'll reply
>
> 2012/4/24, dgkilday57 <dgkilday57@...>:
>>
>>
>> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Bhrihskwobhloukstroy
>> <bhrihstlobhrouzghdhroy@...> wrote:
>>>
>>> 1. */p/ in Porcobera contrasts with /0/ in Ingauni < *Ping'aH-mno-
>>> 'tattoed'; it isn't anti-Celtic, just very archaic (and very limited
>>> in Liguria itself; just in Inland valleys)
>>
>> 'Tattooed'? Who came up with that for the Ingauni? Joan Jett?
>>
>>> 2. Bormani, just like Bormio, can better proceed from *bhor-mo- (*bher-
>>> 'boil')
>>
>> Read Kretschmer's paper in KZ 38.
>>
>>> 3. Bargae does not "evidently" continue a PIE zero-grade; long grade
>>> *Bho:rg'h-aH would be much better (as a collective formation)
>>
>> Baloney.
>>
>>> 4. /ou/ < */eu/ isn't pan-Celtic at all; this is a mere matter of terms.
>>
>> See Matasovic''s remarks.
>>
>>> To sum up, Ligurian is fully Celtic, with just small very archaic
>>> pockets in the Apennines.
>>
>> Again, baloney. Obviously this topic requires the full Day-Killer
>> treatment.
>>
>>> I can reply to every single place-name
>>
>> Anyone can confidently invent pseudologies.
>>
>> DGK
>>
>>
>>
>