Re: xW/w (was: Lithuanian diphthongs)

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "stlatos" <stlatos@...> wrote:

> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "stlatos" <stlatos@> wrote:

> > For example, ~standard * wèkW+ = speak/say, * wègWH+ = speak/say/vow, are too close together to be unrelated, and must actually be * wègWH-xY+ < wègWHdH-xY+ < wèkWdH-xY+ < wèkW+dHèxY+ = make statement / make vow.
> >
> >
> > Metathesis is probably the origin of:
> >
> > *
> > wegWH-xYónt+
> > wexY-gWHónt+
> > we_-gWHónt+
> > wee-gWHónt+
> >
> > va:ghát- = one who makes offerings V S;
> >
>
>
> And, of course, metathesis is the origin of:
>
> *
> wègWH-xY+
> xYèwgWH+
> xYèugWH+
>
> eúkhomai = pray/vow/boast G; oh- = notices/listens for V S; aog- = speak/say Av;
>
>
> to put w by W and e by Y.
>

And, of course, no metathesis in the origin of:

voveo: Lat;

with standard > e-stem from xY as in those verbs < * -èxY+ = be _ , -eyè -xY+ = cause _ .


*
wegWh-xY-t.ó+ = vowed / a vow
wogWh-xY-t.ó+ ( / W_W )
wogWh-_-t.ó+
wogWh-a-t.ó+
wokWh-a-t.ó+

vufetes (p d) U;