From: Rick McCallister
Message: 66157
Date: 2010-05-19
I take that "Paleo-Baltic" in the line quoted is simply a absent-minded error for Paleo-Balkan.
There is a theory, advanced particularly by Ivan Duridanov, that Paleo-Balkan (Thracian at least) does have a special relationship within Indo-European to Baltic, but this seems to be very much an individual opinion.
Dan Milton
I've read Duridanov's on-line stuff but I don't know enough to tell whether he's on the mark in regard to his Baltic-Balkan branch. We've mentioned this subject in the past but in case something new has pooped up or someone has some new insights into whether or not Duridanov's links to Baltic are truly on the mark or far-fetched
--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Anatoly Guzaev" <anatoly_guzaev@...> wrote:
>
> ["...Albanian and the Paleo-Baltic Dialects make up a group of Indo-European languages "...]
>
> Is this an indisputable fact, or only an assumption?
>
>
>
> From: slag310
> Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 11:15 PM
> To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [tied] Albanian and the Paleo-Balkan Dialects and Indo-European religion
>
>
>
> Albanian and the Paleo-Balkan Dialects and Indo-European religion.
>
> I have opened another new page on my website, this one at:
> http://pierce.yolasite.com/albanian
> See what you think! It is still very introductory, but it has most of the best links to information about these languages.
>
> Slag310
>