Re: [tied] Giebul/tów, another 'princely grave'

From: tgpedersen
Message: 65028
Date: 2009-09-16

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "bmscotttg" <BMScott@...> wrote:
>
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "tgpedersen" <tgpedersen@> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Rejecting Snorri as a source based on no particular argument
> > except by fiat that all such sources, ie. North European,
> > pre-Christian sources are false [...]
>
> ... is a figment of your imagination. Conclusions about medieval
> sources are the result of extensive evaluation, not fiat.

Show me any such recognized article, book or whatever which considers a hypothesis that the events described in those sources are real and took place as described there, and then refutes that hypothesis.


Torsten