Re: Some Yatsenko texts

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "tgpedersen" <tgpedersen@...> wrote:

>
> > ****GK: ... I've re-examined your upload of type III on the basis
> > of my newly acquired gakk-reading expertise (:=)) and compared
> > the signs to those in the Yatsenko article. There are most
> > definitely three gakks there, distinct yet closely related. What
> > is even more interesting is that they are most certainly of the
> > Farzoi family type! Not Farzoi's own but very close. The Farzoi
> > gakk was a straight line topped by a simple half moon on one side
> > and an inverted half moon on the bottom side. The Mushov gakks
> > are all variants of this: one is in the form of a cross which is
> > actually a Farzoi marker crossed with another Farzoi marker.
> > Another is like a Farzoi marker broken in half with the two
> > pieces rejoined at right angle at the middle. The third is also a
> > broken up Farzoi type with the pieces connected by a straight
> > line at the middle. Apart from this, the spearhead has a number
> > of circular lunar or solar signs, which to Yatsenko would
> > indicate that it is Germanic. If the dating of the grave is as
> > above, it is possible that these gakks belonged to a successor of
> > Inismei (Farzoi's royal clan seems to have ruled until the
> > mid-2nd c.CE. But other interpretations are also possible
> > (Farzoi's brother? or some other relative?.*****
> >
>
> Take a look again at
> http://tinyurl.com/mrgt4p
> fig. 7/5
> Should we see instead both Pharzoios' tamga 5/85 and the top tamga
> of the Mus^ov spearblade as derived from 7/5?

7/5 seems also to appear in Parthia and Persia.
http://tinyurl.com/mj6wcw

> And how should the
> information under the line 'Tamgas common to the areas in the Anhak
> ulus in Khakassia ca. 100 BC - 50 AD and N.Pontic Sarmats ca. 50 -
> 150 AD' be interpreted?
>
> Note that the tamga of the royal Alanian clan Aravelian fig. 14-i
> is likewise crossed with itself at right angles in 5/25.

And note that Inismeios' tanga 5/86 (also found in Mongolia) can be understood as two Pharzoios tamgas 5/85 placed end-to-end and merged.

As for the triskelion of the Mus^ov phalerae (see file section) I misidentified it at first as 6/92, from the South Urals. That's wrong, it's the mirror image. Rather it's 28/48 in
http://tinyurl.com/l5ba84
which belongs to the Siyavushid dynasty
http://tinyurl.com/mpdf2e
which founded Parthia. Whatever that means in Mus^ov.


Torsten