From: shivkhokra
Message: 64815
Date: 2009-08-18
>Are you suggesting that since IE did not arise in India so it could have only come to India through an invasion? Also can you please point me to some references that contain IE could not have arisen in India? I would like to learn more about this.
>
>
> --- On Tue, 8/18/09, shivkhokra <shivkhokra@...> wrote:
>
> From: shivkhokra <shivkhokra@...>
> Subject: [tied] Re: Technical adstrate in Indo-aryan?
> To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Tuesday, August 18, 2009, 3:59 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Rick,
>
> --- In cybalist@... s.com, Rick McCallister <gabaroo6958@ ...> wrote:
>
> >:*******R A very interesting point given that opposition to AIT is rooted in a post-colonial sense of inferiority that assuages shame by inventing new myths.
>
> >
>
>
>
> Opposition to AIT is because there is no evidence for an invsion by the aryans. What new myths might you be referring to?
>
>
>
> -ShivrajYou've invented the myth that IE arose in India. This is obviously wrong to anyone who has seen any of the evidence
>