[SPAM] [tied] Re: Latin /a/ after labials, IE *mori

From: alexandru_mg3
Message: 63989
Date: 2009-06-02

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "alexandru_mg3" <alexandru_mg3@...> wrote:

> > > ----------------------------------------------------------
> > > Goth. kno:dai [dat.sg.f.] 'family' *g^noh1-
> > > Skt jña:ti 'kinsman *g^noh1-ti-
> > > Latv. znuõts 'son-in-law' *g^noh1-t-
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Hardly any other? How come that most linguists interpret the word as
> > *g^noh3-ti- 'known, recognised' (see Lubotsky for I-Ir. and Derksen for
> > Balto-Slavic), perhaps secondarily contaminated with *g^enh1- in Lith.
> > z^éntas. I, for one, wouldn't like to beget my own son-in-law, but I'd
> > like to know him.
> >
> > Piotr



> (even for Lubotsky I'm not sure, as I remember)
> Marius


And I remembered correctly :

=============================================================
Lubotsky's derivation of:
Skt. jña:ti 'kinsman'
ROOT: *g^neh1-
PATTERN: DReH-
=============================================================

URL:
---
http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=6jBnmLnhXWwC&pg=PA10&dq=Lubotsky+j%C3%B1ati

Marius