> I have the first edition printed in October 1931 in Chartres, rue Fulbert
> par l'Imprimerie Durand.
> In-8, pleine percaline, XIX-1108 pages.
> What else do you need to know ?
>
> You have made me check that page already so many times it's wearing faster
> than the others.
>
> Arnaud
>
I supposed you were more intelligent, Arnaud. You owe me an appology for
trying to beat me with an errata in an old edition of Ernout-Meillet.
Latin mi:luus has a LONG i: in every Latin dictionary.
============
M. Octavia Alexander,
I don't owe you anything, least of all an appology (sic) with two p's.
I'm not trying to beat you, you are damn wrong from the start.
As far as I remember, this must be the third or fourth time you bring that
issue of Milvus having a long i: on discussion in Nostratic or Cybalist.
So I think the situation has to be clarified once and for good.
First, You claim I'm lying or having a bad sight.
Both of them wrong,
and both of them off topic and ad-hominem.
Now you claimed once again that milvus does not have a long i: in any Latin
dictionary,
a stupid claim that is provably wrong,
I was kind enough to give you the right references.
But it does not work.
So,
As the risk of being either moderated or thrown out,
let us put it straight and clear,
You are wrong,
and you are stupid
and you are just a little overweening piece of stubborn shit.
I guess this fact is well-known enough to protect me from too much
moderational wrath.
Am I clear enough with that idiotic issue about milvus ?
Cornuto di merda !
My apologies (with one p !) to the other listees.
Arnaud