Re: *y-n,W- "subordinate"?

From: Rick McCallister
Message: 61811
Date: 2008-11-23

--- On Sat, 11/22/08, G&P <G.and.P@...> wrote:

> From: G&P <G.and.P@...>
> Subject: RE: [tied] *y-n,W- "subordinate"?
> To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Saturday, November 22, 2008, 4:03 AM
> >Piotr, why not to organize the construction of such a
> dictionary, on
> >this forum, .
>
> A great deal of the labour could be saved if (at least
> initially) we didn't
> simply repeat information in Pokorny, but instead
> concentrated on
> identifying the newly-spelled roots with suffixes (perhaps
> also with
> whatever information is needed to justify the new
> reconstruction), and
> otherwise, where possible, simply referring to Pokorny for
> details of the
> attested languages.
>
> Peter

I suppose, that legally and ethnically, it beats plagiarizing him.