Re: Oedipus

From: Francisco Antonio Doria
Message: 60314
Date: 2008-09-25

E' Professor Doria. E falo português, sim.

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Rick McCallister <gabaroo6958@...> wrote:
>
> Acho que o senhor Doria fala português
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Francisco Antonio Doria <doriagen@...>
> To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 6:52:18 PM
> Subject: Re: [tied] Oedipus
>
>
>
> Vous pouvez m'adresser en français, si vous voulez. O forse in
italiano.
>
> --- In cybalist@... s.com, "Arnaud Fournet" <fournet.arnaud@ ...>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Francisco Antonio Doria
> >
> > We have evidence for a Tawagalawas/ Eteokles; we have evidence for a
> Kádmos
> > at Thebes. What more evidence, if any, do we have for the existence
> of a
> > historical Oedipus?
> >
> > ==========
> >
> > By the way,
> > our predecessors have chosen a soft bourgeois interpretation of
> oidi-pe:s as
> > standing for pous "foot". Swollen foot ?
> > What is the reason to reject a more straightforward post-bourgeois
> option
> > of -pe:s standing for *pes "penis" ? Swollen ** ?
> > Makes more sense !?
> > What would be your comments ?
> > Has it been suggested already ?
> >
> > Arnaud
> >
> > PS
> > I suppose you need to be a little bit "French" to propose that,
> > I'm afraid I won't apologize for that !
> >
>