--- In
cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "tgpedersen" <tgpedersen@...> wrote:
>
> Yes, because if AIT is true, the present Indian ruling class is
> related more to the former British colonials that to the people
> of large parts of India
What Aryan-invasion theory not over a century old claims that?
India is presently a democracy, so in what sense does it have
a ruling class, much less a class consistently related to any
other group, including the ancient Aryans?
Moreover the British aren't Aryan, certainly not genetically,
but not even culturally or linguistically. English isn't an
Indo-Iranian language.
Can you really look at two Indians side by side, from any two
castes, and find them less closely related to one another than
either to a typical Briton, Torsten?
> and therefore has no more right to rule them than the British
> did.
Such a conclusion is a necessary one for a nationalist only.
David