Res: Res: [tied] g^H: an older suffix in PIE adjectives?

From: Joao S. Lopes
Message: 59518
Date: 2008-07-10

----- Mensagem original ----
De: Rick McCallister <gabaroo6958@...>
Para: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
Enviadas: Quinta-feira, 10 de Julho de 2008 13:30:34
Assunto: Re: Res: [tied] g^H: an older suffix in PIE adjectives?





----- Original Message ----
From: Joao S. Lopes <josimo70@... com.br>
To: cybalist@... s.com
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 11:26:36 AM
Subject: Res: [tied] g^H: an older suffix in PIE adjectives?


Analysing a set of Greek adjectives it's possible to detect many patterns: most of them fit into three groups:

1) zero-grade-root +-u : bradys, brakhys, platys, takhys, pakhys, drimys, thrasys, barys, elakhys, glykys etc, probably polys, he:dys
2) zero-grade-root +-ro: hygros, elaphros, pikros, mikros, makros, hadros (and maybe auste:ros, xe:ros, liparos) (cf. Latin scaber, glaber, vafer)
3) zero-grade-root +no : iskhnos, pyknos, kainos

This no- and ro- names must come from -n/r names. Many of the u-names in Latin gained i-augment: levis, brevis, gravis, suavis, pinguis.
JS Lopes


"names" ="nouns", right? No espanhol "nombre" quer dezir "noun"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sorry! I meant to say nouns. In Portuguese "noun" is "substantivo".



Novos endereços, o Yahoo! que você conhece. Crie um email novo com a sua cara @ymail.com ou @rocketmail.com.
http://br.new.mail.yahoo.com/addresses