Re: a discussion on OIT: attention moderator

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "fournet.arnaud" <fournet.arnaud@...>
wrote:

>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "koenraad_elst" <koenraad.elst@...>
> >
> >> Some other interesting reference for the enlightment of OIT nazis
> >>like you,
> >
> >Dear Mr. Moderator,
>
> > Weren't you going to intervene against this kind of language?
>
> >Incidentally, in the AIT debate, the Nazis were 100% on the side of
> >the AIT. They believed in a European rather than an Indian
> >homeland for PIE. They acknowledged one single group of
> >Indo-European-speakers in Europe as originating in India, viz. the
> >Gypsies, and they tried to extirpate them.
>
> >Thanks,
>
> >KE
>
> ===========
> Dear Mr Elst
>
> Cybalist should rule out any mail talking about or hinting at OIT,
> which has the same level of junk status as
> Atlantide, or the Martians building Egyptian Pyramids,
> There is a rule precluding pseudo-science
> OIT falls in that category,
>

In what sense? I can see that it's either OIT or AIT, no third option
is possible, or linguistics doesn't matter, but why ban one possible
option beforehand?

> As regards the word Nazis, Haven't you noticed that M. K.P. made a
> clear pledge to burn all western people, whom he considers as
> racist, colonialist, etc without any distinction.
>

Are you sure that's the comparison you want to use? The Nazis also
burned those books which contained ideas they didn't like.


Torsten