From: fournet.arnaud
Message: 58477
Date: 2008-05-14
----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick Ryan" <proto-language@...>
>
>> =====
>>
>> *a is conspicuous rare and does not enter in any morphological
>> alternation.
>>
>> This is the major fact in favor of the standard theory.
>>
>> Arnaud
>> ==============
>
> ***
> Patrick:
>
>
> *a does not figure in any morphological alternation (Ablaut/apophony)
> because it was not a possible outcome of *A(blautvokal), which had only
> *e, *o, *°, and *Ø as possibilities.
==========
You previously alleged examples of *a
reflected as <a>.
Now *a is the same as *e and *o !!
You are so incredibly incoherent
from one day to the next.
Arnaud
=========