Re: Transcriptions

>These were displayed correctly because, this time, you encoded your
>message in ISO-8859-1.

Sheesh: I tried ISO-8859-2. :-( (In the text I received from the
yahoogroups server the ö's and ü's were already altered, but in
the... good way: tilde and circumflex.

OK. Both, ISO-8859-1 and ISO-8859-2 contain these char(acter)s.

>>�, ê, �, �, û

But why does Unicode not work?! (From the Macintosh platform it seems
to work better. Encodings under Linux are the words. Seemingly.)

>Cze��! (not _czeszcz_ ^_^)

s´ and c´? (I was encouraged by szcz spellings found via Google :-))

George