Re: Not "catching the wind " , or, what ARE we discussing?

From: fournet.arnaud
Message: 56461
Date: 2008-04-02

----- Original Message -----
From: tgpedersen
> ==================
>
> Catti points at *ka?-t-
> Pok 521 has the alternating root
> skait skaid "bright"
> the Catti are the bright ones.

That would explain why you aren't a Chatti.
What happened to the -i-?
Torsten
=============
Do you mean
Filius is not from *dheH1-

This is not the first time
we see -i- here and no -i- there.

Cf. digit and daktulos

Arnaud
=========

> Matt river points at *ma?-t- "water"
> Cf. PAA *ma?- "water"
> aquae mattiacae is watery waters.

PAA *ma?- "water" and therefore it's Celtic?
Why? Because the main language in Paris is Arabic?
And if I deny that, you say 'NSDAP' as ominously as you can?

===========
We have already discussed this root *ma? "water"
which is Pok 699 ma: < ma?-
We don't need PAA to know this is maH2
but PAA helps to determine that H2 here is *?

Arnaud
==============

> Standard Celtic.

Sez who? Goscinny? Uderzo? You can't change the fact that the Chatti
archaeologically aren't Celtic.
Torsten
============

I suppose I may have overlooked
a reference pointing to this.
Please give it again.

Arnaud

===============