Re: 'Vocalic Theory'

From: Patrick Ryan
Message: 56245
Date: 2008-03-30

----- Original Message -----
From: "Miguel Carrasquer Vidal" <miguelc@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 3:23 PM
Subject: Re: [tied] RE: 'Vocalic Theory'


> On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 21:01:21 +0100, "fournet.arnaud"
> <fournet.arnaud@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
> >>

<snip>

> In fact, cf. *meh2- in e.g. Lat. ma:turus. It can't be *h1
> or *h3, which are lost in Hittite in this position (*h1 is
> lost in *any* position).
>
> >What is Pokorny number for *seh2-wr ?
>
> *su:-ro-, *sou-ro-, p. 1039.
>
>
> =======================
> Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
> miguelc@...

*ma:-, 'mature' is *maH-

*me:-, 'measure', is *meH-.

Two different, _unrelated_ words!


Patrick