Re: Re[5]: [tied] Re: dhuga:ter

From: Patrick Ryan
Message: 55583
Date: 2008-03-20

----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian M. Scott" <BMScott@...>
To: "fournet.arnaud" <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 4:39 PM
Subject: Re[5]: [tied] Re: dhuga:ter


> At 5:22:17 PM on Thursday, March 20, 2008, fournet.arnaud
> wrote:
>
> > From: Brian M. Scott
>
> >> At 3:57:58 PM on Thursday, March 20, 2008, fournet.arnaud
> >> wrote:
>

<snip>

> Which says absolutely nothing relevant. You are still
> failing to distinguish (1) exposition of a hypothesis from
> (2) the train of thought that led to the hypothesis in the
> first place. As those of us who have published academic
> papers know, they are usually very different.
>
> Brian


***

You are 100% correct! And the context described certainly has <senex> as a
member.


Patrick

***