From: fournet.arnaud
Message: 55422
Date: 2008-03-17
----- Original Message -----
From: Patrick Ryan
To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 12:11 AM
Subject: [Courrier indésirable] Re: Re: Re: [tied] Latin -idus as from dH-
too
There is absolutely no *s-prefix indicating agency in PIE.
Patrick
===========
As usual, you over-act as a result
of your failure to understand.
Who said : the one to be married is a agent ?
S- is just a pronoun
akin to *s-o "anaphoric".
Read an Akkadian grammar
and you will understand.
Arnaud
> ================
>
> A bold analysis of daughter *dhugH2°ter
> could then be from *uk-sor "wife"
> t?_wg-H2_t-er
> one (-er) to be (t?-) married (wg) child (H2_t).
>
> But it's really bold.
>
> Note that sister is not so far :
> s-wed-to:r : the one (s-) who is wed (wed-)
>
> Arnaud
>
> ===============
>
>
>