From: Patrick Ryan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Miguel Carrasquer Vidal" <miguelc@...>
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 5:25 PM
Subject: Re: Re: [tied] Latin -idus as from dH- too
> On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 09:27:34 -0500, "Patrick Ryan"
> <proto-language@...> wrote:
> >I think Olsen is wrong; and I find her proposal that *Ht -> *tH then *th
> >implausible; even further from reality is her idea that *th could be
> >confused or conflated with *dh.
> Only in Italic (simplifying: dh/th > þ > f), Greek (dh > th)
> and Slavic (at least in the sequence -thlo- > -d(h)lo-). In
> Sanskrit, Armenian, Germanic *th is /th/ (i.e. th, t`, þ).
> Miguel Carrasquer Vidal