Re: Latin -idus as from dH- too

From: Patrick Ryan
Message: 55225
Date: 2008-03-15

***

It is not a free-swimming schwa per se but rather simply a voiced [h], which
became a full-fledged vowel.


Patrick

***


----- Original Message -----
From: "fournet.arnaud" <fournet.arnaud@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2008 11:10 AM
Subject: Re: Re: [tied] Latin -idus as from dH- too


>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: alexandru_mg3
>
>
> b) the accent of dHugh2te'r is on -t'er and their is no metathesis
> h-t>t-h => so you assumption is wrong too regarding you trial to save
> somehow the Olsen's theory
>
> Marius
>
> ==============
> Marius
>
> This word is not clearly relevant
> when it comes to Ms. Olsen's theory.
> Cf. my previous remark about boundary juncture.
>
> And what is wrong with
> dhugh2°-ter with a schwa between H2 and t ?
> it seems that suits your own approach .
>
> ARnaud
>
> =============
>
>
>
>