Re: Mille (thousand)

My point is that they may have forgotten that *smi-
was a morpheme and surmised that *s- was s-mobile

--- "fournet.arnaud" <fournet.arnaud@...>
wrote:

>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Rick McCallister
>
> I've seen that but wondered about it
> Was the *s- reanalyzed as s-mobile?
> > ===================
> > http://www.bartleby.com/61/roots/IE164.html
> >
> If you cut *smi - ghesl-
> as s + mi-gheslo
>
> How do you reanalyse mi as < sem "one" ?
>
> I don't think it can be *s mobile.
>
> Arnaud
>
> > ================
> >
> >
> >
>
>

__________________________________________________________

> Looking for last minute shopping deals?
> Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
>

http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping

>
>
>
>
>

____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ