From: Patrick Ryan
----- Original Message -----
From: "etherman23" <etherman23@...>
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2008 2:15 PM
Subject: [tied] Re: Finnish KASKA
--- In email@example.com, "Patrick Ryan" <proto-language@...>
> Well, that certainly would make it more of interest.
PIE *d, Etr t(H)
*sed to sit, satH to sit
*den day, Tin diety associated with the day
*deiw god, heaven , Tivr moon
*dem to build, t(H)am to build
these three are very doubtful:
*deH3 to give, tur to give
*deH2 to divide, itu to divide
*demH to tame, tamna horse
PIE eu/u, Etr u
*H1neun nine, nurpH nine
*teuteH2 people, tut(H)i community, state
*dHeu to pass away, lup to have lived, to die
*bHeu to grow, to be, amu to be
*yeu youth, hus child
here, only <tut(H)i> has a chance of passing the Limburger test ('smelling
less bad than ...').
GBS would have approved as, for him, <ghoti> = <fish>.
But, let us say that PIE *du (zero-grade) = Etruscan <t(h)u> formally, which
I do not belive.
What evidence do you have that *du ever meant 'one' or anything like it?