Re: Meaning of Aryan: now, "white people"?

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, george knysh <gknysh@...> wrote:

>
>
> --- mkelkar2003 <swatimkelkar@...> wrote:
>
> > Very scientific! Dixon's BULLSHIT! punctuality
> > equilibrium model has
> > been validated in a recent Science magazine article
> > Evolution of language in punctual bursts."
> >
> > Every one who does not agree with you is "aged"
> > (Dhavalikar), "compromised" and colored by
> > "indiginist point of view"
> > Not everyone who supports the OIT model is of South
> > Asian origin.
> >
> > Lets continue this "scientific" dialgoue.
> >
> > M. Kelkar
>
> ****GK: The OIT has been effectively refuted time and
> again in our archives. Kelkar has nothing new to
> contribute and just keeps repeating himself, lapsing
> into inconsequential comments such as the above
> instead of dealing with arguments. A familiar tactic.
> I, for one, will henceforth ignore him. But a thought
> comes to mind. Why should someone like Kelkar have the
> right to continue his crusades when Torsten was asked
> to discontinue his Odinist fantasies? Is OIT less
> annoying than Odinism? Or do we discriminate against
> Danes (:=)))? Perhaps we could leave it to our
> moderators to decide when and if Kelkar and his ilk
> have something genuine to advance in favour of their
> views? Why continue repeating ad nauseam e.g. messages
> 43547ss. and many similar contexts?****
>

I did reply to Klejin(?) article you posted earlier. It never
made it through. S/he starts out withe assumption that Rig Veda
records the colonization of India by invading "Aryans" and then tries
to fit the archaeological data into it. The fact is Rig Veda does
not record any such invasion.

M. Kelkar
______________________________________________________________________
______________

> Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
>