From: Richard Wordingham
> I do not understand why <bhájati> needs to be reconstructed as *bho-rather
> than *bhe-.Because in *bHag the *g is a back or low velar - the softening to /j/
> More coloring?
> Why would a palatal <j> color anything to [a]?
> 'g'-coloring is a real 'slippery slope'.