Re: PS Emphatics

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "ualarauans" <ualarauans@...> wrote:

>
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "altamix" <alxmoeller@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Piotr Gasiorowski <gpiotr@>

wrote:

> > >
> > >
> > > >> The INHERITED words in
> > > >> Romanian are those of Latin origin.
> >
> > that is a big trap. Latin layer is an undenyable layer of
> > Romanian
> > language but there is an older layer as Latin. And this layer IS
> > older as the Latin one.
>
> But this layer is not Romanian.

no, it is a layer of Romanian. Romanian is something more as this
layer.

> It belongs to a language which
> preceeded Romanian. It is usually referred to as substrate.

ist is considered to be the substrate and a such statement exclude
any loan but include inheritance-

> Romanian starts with vulgar Latin planted in Dacia.

actualy, it starts with the subtrate.

>
> The phonetic treits are clears here.
> > Writting "IS" with cappitals in this casse shows just an
> > inviolable reality.
>
> It shows your emotional attitude towards this issue.

is the reality to be measured trough emotions? I was just pointing to
the sentence of Piotr regarding the capital letters in the text of
Marious, aka just trying to amuse myself a bit.I don't see the matter
emotional here.

> Does it concern your patriotic feelings?
>

My what? I think we discusse here linguistics, posibilities, times
frames, most probable scenarios and we try to show why something
appears to be probable of not. Feelings here are just bad. It was
showed many times in our history thus it should be better to do not
mix up water with wine and to keep distance with feelings when
speaking about scenarios.


best regards

Alexandru Moeller