R°H in Latin, was: [tied] Re: Brugmann's Law

On Ned, siječanj 20, 2008 2:00 pm, Piotr Gasiorowski wrote:

> On 2008-01-20 10:50, Mate Kapović wrote:
>
>> Why lab- from *lh1b- in Latin? It should be la:b-...
>
> This, according to Schrijver, is how _initial_ (as opposed to _medial_)
> *R.HC- was resolved in Latin. For a similar example, cf. *l.h1d-to- >
> lassus (Gmc. *le:t-).

Of course there are also aR-reflections according to Pedersen. Cf. Lat.
antae ~ Skr. á:ta:, Lat. arduus ~ Skr. u:rdhvás.

Mate