Re: Sard

From: Patrick Ryan
Message: 51503
Date: 2008-01-19

 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2008 1:22 PM
Subject: Re: Re: Re: [tied] Sard

 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2008 7:48 PM
Subject: [Courrier indésirable] Re: Re: [tied] Sard

 
============ ===
; z3 is formally equivalent to Semitic z-r. We also have Sumerian se/i, 'seed',
======
What about *s_H "to sow, seed"
 
***
It is another derivation from SE.
 
***
What about z versus s ?
How do you account for this ?
 
How is s_H derivated from SE ?
 
***
 
By adding HHA to SE.
 
*** 
============ ========= =
and se/ir, 'testicle'. I think it is fairly obvious that Semitic z-r is cognate with IE *ser-, 'flow rapidly, *ejaculate).
=======
Unproved
 
Still unproved as usual
==========
 On the basis of Egyptian z, which narrow the choice to se/i or sa (Egyptian s would be so/u)
========
For what reason ?
 
Still unanswered as usual.
============
 
***
Egyptian z derives from PAA za/i and sa/I; Egyptian s derives from PAA zu and su.
 
***
 and Sumerian s which should reflect se/i, we can say with some probability that the word began with the syllable SE (as opposed to SHE), to which I have assigned the meaning of '(emit) bodily fluids'. On the basis of IE *stre:-, because of the long vowel, I reconstruct RHE (aspirated nasals and R could lengthen the following vowel): SE-RHE, 'bodily fluids-fall down', a fairly accurate characterization of ejaculation. As additional proof, we know that z3 was vocalized as /si/ by the cuneiform transcriptions of Egyptian names.
==========
What is your source ?
 
***
My own work as detailed at my website.
***
 
I am asking for a scientific source.
Not Alice in wonderland's dreams.
 
=========
 
***
What have _you_ published, on the web or anywhere else?
 
Patrick