Re: [tied] tt/st/ss

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Piotr Gasiorowski <gpiotr@...> wrote:

>
> On 2007-06-03 00:39, stlatos wrote:
>
> > But Iranian has dht>ddh but no loss of s/z between obs.
>
> Iranian has *-d[z]H-t- > *-dzdH- > -zd-, cf. Av. v&r&zda- : Ved.
> vr.ddHá-. It loses the stop component of the affricate.

Yes, I realized you'd probably say a fric+H could do what was
normally done by a stop+H (see previous).

However, without dehi, datte, etc., explained in Skt, I still stand
by my theory.