RE : [tied] Re: Ariovistus was not an "Aryan"

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "stlatos" <stlatos@...> wrote:

>
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "tgpedersen" <tgpedersen@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, patrick cuadrado <dicoceltique@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > One Suggestion about Ario-Uistus
> > > I think it's a Celtic word
> > > Are/Ari- = before
> > > Uid-/Uida-/Uidi- = Sight < Knowledge
> > > So Ario-Uistus < anticipates man (warrior quality) or the man
> > > knows/guess beforhand
> >
> > The problem is that Celtic, Germanic, Italic all have -d + t-, dh
> > + t-, -t + t- > -ss- (OIr. fess, fiss knowledge), not -st-
>
> Some words do have -st-;

In Iranian, yes, but in Celtic *weid- doesn't.

> the order was probably tt>st>ts>ss.

The order of? Why 'probably'?

> Some words didn't have metathesis,

Please mention a ppp in -ts- of a root in -d, -dh, -t.

> or the order was restored at some morpheme boundaries.

Example?


Torsten