Re: [tied] Re: Again with the PIE homeland thing- RE: *(s)teuros

That way they can claim more roots. I seem to remember
quite a few such roots in Bomhard's earlier work.

--- Francesco Brighenti <frabrig@...> wrote:

>
>
>
>
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "C. Darwin
> Goranson"
> <cdog_squirrel@...> wrote:
>
> > Along with the ongoingly discussed PIE *(s)tauros
> - Proto-Semitic
> > *t~awr- (both bull, first also aurochs, second
> also ox),.......
>
> I wonder why S. Starostin's databases don't venture
> into comparing
> these two proto-words, which look astonishingly
> similar in form and
> meaning:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/yt3b79
> http://tinyurl.com/yux6my
>
> Also, these two proto-words are apparently not
> compared in A.
> Bomhard's 2007 Nostratic book, of which I have a
> preprint.
>
> Any thoughts, anyone?
>
> Thanks and best regards,
> Francesco Brighenti
>
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com