Re: Measuring Language Divergence by Intra-Lexical Comparison

From: mkelkar2003
Message: 48300
Date: 2007-04-11

http://www.ling.helsinki.fi/filt/events/conferences/2004/msg01136.html

Prague: Computing and Historical Phonology, a workshop at ACL 2007 -- CFP

* To: <rasmusse at ptd dot net>
* Subject: Prague: Computing and Historical Phonology, a workshop
at ACL 2007 -- CFP
* From: "Priscilla Rasmussen" <rasmusse at ptd dot net>
* Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:58:30 -0500
* Organization: ACL/AMTA/ARCS/dg.o
* Reply-to: "Priscilla Rasmussen" <rasmusse at ptd dot net>

Call for Papers



ACL Workshop, 2007 Prague

Computing and Historical Phonology

Ninth Meeting of the ACL Special Interest Group in Computational

Morphology and Phonology

June 28, 2007



Keynote Speaker



Brett Kessler, Washington University, St. Louis, will speak on

word similarity metrics and multilateral comparison.



Chairs: John Nerbonne, Greg Kondrak, Mark Ellison



Background



Historical phonology is the study of how the sounds and sound systems

of a language evolve, and includes research issues concerning the

triggering of sound changes; their temporal and geographic propagation

(including lexical diffusion); the regularity/irregularity of sound

change; the role of borrowing and analogy in sound change; the

interaction of sound change with the phonemic system (potentially

promoting certain changes, but also neutralizing phonemic

distinctions); and the detection of these phenomena in historical

documents.



There is a substantial and growing body of work applying computational

techniques of various sorts to problems in historical phonology. We

mention a few here to give a flavor of the sort of work we would like

to organize as a coherent theme in a SIGMORPHON workshop. Kessler

(2001) estimates the likelihood of chance correspondences using

permutation statistics; Kondrak (2002) develops algorithms to detect

cognates and sound correspondences; McMahon and McMahon (2005) and

also Nakhleh, Ringe and Warnow (2005) apply phylogenetic techniques to

comparative reconstruction; and Ellison and Kirby (2006) suggest means

of detecting relationships which do not depend on word by word

comparisons. But we hasten to add that many more important problems

may also be addressed computationally (see below).



Workshop



The purpose of the workshop is to bring together researchers

interested in applying computational techniques to problems in

historical phonology. We deliberately define the scope of the

workshop broadly to include problems such as identifying spelling

variants in older manuscripts, searching for cognates, hypothesizing

and confirming sound changes and/or sound correspondences, modeling

likely sound changes, the relation between synchronic social and

geographic variation to historical change, the detection of phonetic

signals of relatedness among potentially related languages,

phylogenetic reconstruction based on sound correspondences among

languages, dating historical changes, or others.



We are emphatically open to proposals to apply techniques from other

areas to problems in historical phonology such as applying work on

confusable product names to the modeling of likely sound

correspondences or the application of phylogenetic analysis from

evolutionary biology to the problem of phonological reconstruction.



Call for papers



The workshop will be open to all areas of computation applied to

morphology and phonology. Papers will be on substantial, original, and

unpublished research on any aspect of computational phonology and

computational morphology. But we wish to focus on papers on

historical phonology.



Papers are invited on substantial, original, and unpublished research

investigating historical phonology, including detecting historical

relationships, analysing and verifying putative detection, and

and interpretation. The submission deadline is March 26, 2007.



Submission Details: see http://www.let.rug.nl/alfa/Prague/



Program Committee



Chris Brew, Ohio State University

Pierre Darlu, Paris

Michael Dunn, Max Planck, Nijmegen

Sheila Embleton, York University, Toronto

Hans Goebl, Salzburg

Russell Gray, Auckland

Sheldon Harrison, Western Australia

Wilbert Heeringa, Groningen

Brian Joseph, Ohio State University

Brett Kessler, Washington University, St. Louis

Simon Kirby, Edinburgh

Bill Kretzschmar, Georgia

Franz Manni, Paris

Hermann Moisl, Newcastle

David Nash, Australian National University, Canberra

Michael Oakes, Sunderland

Jon Patrick, Sydney

Gerald Penn, Toronto

Janet Pierrehumbert, Northwestern

Thomas Pilz, Duisburg

Joe Salmons, Wisconsin

Tandy Warnow, University of Texas

David Yarowsky, Johns Hopkins



References



Ellison, Mark and Simon Kirby (2006) Measuring Language

Divergence by Intra-Lexical Comparison. Proc. ACL 2006,

Sydney, 273-280.



Kessler, Brett (2001) The Significance of Word Lists.

CSLI: Stanford.



Kondrak, Grzegorz (2002) Algorithms for Language

Reconstruction. Ph.D Thesis, University of Toronto, July.



McMahon, April and Rob McMahon (2005) Language

Classification by Numbers, OUP: Oxford.



Nakhleh, Luay, Don Ringe and Tandy Warnow (2005) Perfect

phylogenetic networks: A new methodology for

reconstructing the evolutionary history of natural

languages. Language 81(2), 382-420.